Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
1 to 10 of about 16
Both events also could force Washington to rethink or revive its Middle East partnerships.
After the second general election in a year, Israeli politics are in flux amid another potential stalemate. What will happen now?
It’s easy to forget just how remarkable the nuclear talks with Iran are and that there is no better alternative to the current approach.
The world can be an awfully dangerous and unpredictable place.
With intensifying international pressure to end hostilities, a brief lull in fighting currently prevails in Gaza. But a formal ceasefire between Israel and Hamas has proven elusive.
The longer Washington puts forward half measures on the peace process, the more damage is done to its interests and reputation in the Arab world.
A two-state solution will soon be impossible. Despite the difficulties, the United States needs to make a major effort to find a solution—the costs of waiting are much too great.
A regional approach that pushes for peace between Israel and the entire Arab world will become unavoidable if a bilateral solution between Israel and Palestine is no longer possible.
With little chance for a breakthrough in Israeli–Palestinian direct talks, the best hope for the Middle East is a regional approach that secures peace between Israel and the entire Arab world.
The ongoing IAEA investigations in Iran and Syria and Israel’s nuclear capability are among the top issues on the agenda for the June IAEA Board of Governors meeting.