Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
1 to 10 of about 22
Both events also could force Washington to rethink or revive its Middle East partnerships.
It’s easy to forget just how remarkable the nuclear talks with Iran are and that there is no better alternative to the current approach.
Washington and its allies should strategically continue patient diplomacy unless Iran resumes provocative nuclear activities.
Russia’s annexation of Crimea and possible future incursions into eastern Ukraine could reshape the geopolitical map of Europe and derail cooperation between Moscow and the West for years to come.
The outcome of Iran’s election will not have much of an impact on Tehran’s foreign policy and nuclear strategy—the supreme leader, not the president, makes those decisions.
The case for a limited Israeli or U.S. military intervention to take out Tehran’s nuclear capability seems to be losing credibility by the day.
Iran’s nuclear program continues to be a source of tension between Iran and the West, but there appears to be an increasingly positive atmosphere in Iran for reaching a nuclear deal.
What will it take to end the Iran nuclear crisis and what is the role of the IAEA?
With anxieties over the nuclear activities of North Korea and Iran looming large, heads of state from 53 countries convened in Seoul this week to reaffirm and intensify their commitment to prevent nuclear materials from getting into the hands of terrorists.
Tensions between Iran and the international community continue to rise over the country's nuclear program. Leaders on both sides should take appropriate steps to deescalate the crisis and set the stage for reengagement after the U.S. presidential election.